Last May (2018) we shared that Ohio voters approved an initiative for gerrymandering reform, with plans to push forward the approved reform in 2021. This week, those efforts were boosted when a U.S. federal court ruled that the states current congressional map is illegal.
The judges in this case stated that, ‘Partisan gerrymandering’ occurs when the dominant party in government draws district lines to entrench itself in power and to disadvantage the disfavored party’s voters.”
After the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed and argued this Ohio case, the federal court deemed that the current congressional map was drawn intentionally with partisan favor given to gaining and maintaining as many Republican seats as possible.
The New York Times reports, “A federal court on Friday tossed out Ohio’s congressional map, ruling that Republican state lawmakers had carved up the state to give themselves an illegal partisan advantage and to dilute Democrats’ votes in a way that predetermined the outcome of elections.”
The judges unanimously agreed on the ruling, and in their opinion wrote, “In this case the bottom line is that the dominant party in state government manipulated district lines in an attempt to control electoral outcomes and thus direct the political ideology of the state’s congressional delegation.’’
The decision will go next to the Supreme Court, which has yet to make a ruling on whether partisan gerrymandering will be upheld as constitutionally allowable. However, even before then the Supreme Court will review similar appeals from Maryland and North Carolina this spring If successful, these cases will push us closer towards outlawing partisan gerrymandering altogether. Federal courts have already ruled in Wisconsin, North Carolina, Maryland, and Michigan that partisan gerrymandering is illegal.
Following this current ruling and the ballot initiative passed last year, will be redistricting and creating new congressional maps after the 2020 census. The state will have to develop a temporary plan for the 2020 election, leaving Ohio free to restore it’s democracy and renew the influence of their citizen’s true interests and the power of their votes. Prior to Friday’s ruling, Ohio’s voters represented a swing state, with often close elections, and yet their representatives were 75% Republican.
What are your state’s policies on gerrymandering? How might our elections change for the better if the Supreme Court rules partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional?
- Maybe the moments that feel the most blank, uncreative, and unproductive are the very moments when our best ideas are forming themselves, somewhere beyond our conscious thoughts. Read More »
- The 17 Sustainable Development Goals are now adopted by 193 countries and represent a level of international collaboration unparalleled in human history. Read More »
- Both Google and Yelp have reported a drastic surge in searches for Black-owned businesses since the beginning of June. Now both companies are adding icons that help customers more easily identify Black-owned businesses. Read More »
- Despite the notion that we are changing for the worse, part of this story is also that nothing ever really changes. We never really change. Our ways of being never really change. Read More »
- We tend to project our insecurities onto others. We see in others what we fear about ourselves. These projections can be our greatest teachers. Read More »